We were about to start the retrospective, and the usual question of who would take notes was hanging in the air. I could see a couple of people already checking their calendars, a subtle sign they were hoping not to be picked. It was that small moment of friction I wanted to avoid altogether.
Letting the wheel decide
I brought up the wheel on the shared screen, a simple circle with our team's names. The silence in the room shifted from hesitant to curious. There was a collective, almost relieved exhale when I explained we’d use it for a few different decisions today, not just one.Someone made a joke about it being like a game show, which lightened the mood. I spun it for the first item, and we all watched the cursor slow down. It landed on a name, and the person just nodded and said, "Alright, I can do that." No debate, no shuffling of excuses.
When the choice isn't personal
The real test came later when we needed to pick a focus area for our next sprint. The options were all valid, but each had its own champion. Suggesting one over another felt like picking sides. So I added the topics to the wheel instead.Spinning it for something substantive felt different. We weren't offloading a chore; we were letting chance guide a strategic choice. When it landed, the discussion that followed was surprisingly productive. Because the 'who' was removed, we could all just talk about the 'what.'
The relief in the room
It wasn't about the wheel being magic. It was about it being neutral. It absorbed the potential for perceived unfairness, so we didn't have to.
Powered by SpinzyWheel.com